Sociology & Scientific Depends Essay Example for Free

Sociology Scientific Depends EssaySociologists have been divided on the issue of whether or not sociology is a science for as long as anyone remembers. It is a very controversial topic in sociology, due to the number of conflicting views more or less what it is to be scientific and according to the definitions of what is scientific, whether sociology can be categorised as a science.Durkheim and Compte, positivists believed that sociological studies should be based on the same logic and methods as natural science they stated that this would create a positive science society and would allow us to discover laws of human behaviour, similar to the way scientists detect the laws of gravity. Positivists believe that human behaviour, like that of a plant is influenced by external factors, that society shapes us and therefore that these factors can be isolated, controlled and measured. Durkheim believed that he had done however this when he had studied suicide, isolated the factor of being isolated as the cause of suicide.see morewhen did sociology beginPopper was a famous philosopher of science, and he concord with some of the positivists theories, claiming that indeed sociology could be a science. He said that natural sciences are scientific because they use the hypothetico-deductive approach, and look at grounds which may overthrow their theory, as well as enforce it, he then went on to say that if sociologist could look at conflicting, as well as supporting evidence when trying to prove their theories, then indeed sociology could be considered scientific.Popper disagrees that human behaviour is only a product of outside stimuli, and so he is not a positivist, he simply agrees that sociology can be classed as scientific but in order to do so, studies must be conducted so that a scheme can be enforced or falsified. Popper argued that Marxism wasnt a scientific approach, because when its theory of a revolution failed but come true, they simply pushed its c oming further into the future, kind of of admitting the original hypothesis was untrue, therefore they prevented any possibility that the original theory had been false because they simply adapted it.Realists also believe that sociology is scientific, and claim that there is not much difference between sociological studies and natural science investigations. They held this view because like natural science investigations, sociology tries to explain the causes of behaviour in terms of inherent causes, which are not visible in everyday life.Sayer focussed on the fact that in all areas of science there were open and closed systems, for manikin in some situations, a lab can be used where variables can be controlled, but also in areas such as meteorology, experiments cannot evermore be fully controlled, he argued that sociology faced the same problem, studying issues which were relevant but complex, like meteorologists, sociologists had to deal with the fact that there may be other(a ) influences, but this does not mean that the studies they do are not scientific.Both study hidden causes of things relevant to their field, in ways that can be seen as scientific. The realist definition of science is Being scientific involves explaining behaviour in terms of underlying structures, mechanisms and processes. They believe that natural scientists and sociologists do, therefore sociology should be classed as a science.