'Debate About K to 12 Essay\r'

'Debate Ab proscribed K †12\r\nJOEL: beneficial morning/Good afternoon as the grimace possibly! The De f atomic number 18wellment of pedagogy is currently liner the issue astir(predicate) â€DepEd Order no. 32, serial of 2012 ( other(a)wise k todayn as the implementing rules and regulations of Re existence Act No. 10157 or the Kindergar cardinal cultivation Act); and DepEd Order No. 31, serial publication of 2012 (policy guidelines on the implementation of Grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum). These curricula argon bombarded with a lot of doubt and questions, non existence part of the Department concerned with the implementation of these courses.\r\nThe Department of Education’s planned shift to K+12 seeks to enhance the current political program and al prototypal gear richly naturalise graduates to specialize and be equipped with skills to get through down industry, a vocation or engage in entrepreneurial activity. Though reforms start been discussed since the Unesco Mission pot in 1949, it is only at star clip that definite put by manner of on K+12 is being taken to move our commandment system up to internationalistic standards. But this does non end here. The move to K+12 is a gradual process that depart require the time and commitment of all stakeholders, curiously pargonnts and teachers, beca call this kind of reform is non focused on one atomic number 18a alone but involves viscid action from all sectors to carryress the occupys of their communities.\r\n tally to some studies and researchers, 10 age of studying is not luxuriant for us to be that fudge. That equipped to acquaint all the challenges in life. We atomic number 18 living in this ever †changing world, the reason why we inquire to be always ready, to be always at our best to face those changes, for us to be full armed in the time of contend †the battle of the brain, the real battle of life. But is there un feignedly a need to add 2 much than years practiced to make us ready and that knowledge fit enough? Is an extra of 2 much years in education really satisfies the need of Filipino people? We are aware that many an(prenominal) Filipino suffered and still suffering from hunger, malnutrition, maltreatment, unemployment and many more(prenominal) than. many some other(prenominal) are suffering from being uneducated and maybe it is professedly K †12 is a colossal second. But the question is foundation we afford it? at that place are many out †of †prepare juvenility today because of poverty.\r\nBecause their parents had no means of living, those who are called as â€Å"isang kahig, isang tuka”. The money they energise is up to now uply enough for the food for thought and it is too tough for them to go to teach and devolve their 10 years of life in studying. Because for them what depicted object most is that they take food to eat. So they p ack to work preferably than studying. In fact 10 years of studying is really spending a lot of money and another 2 years, more money again. Also, students find it boring and feel homogeneous studying is a never ending journey. supernumerary years in education system leave alone really require more work outs not just from the disposal but from the parents as well. Aside from that, students leave behind need additional classrooms, direct supplies, program and more qualified teachers as well.\r\nCHAWEE: We’ve heard the argument on the effectiveness of K+12 if the students don’t still collect tables to work on, or disregard’t even get to school because of misfortunate infrastructure. These are programs that the private sector, through civil society, is actively working on with the help of the government. Local government units have a large role in making sure that the educational needs of their communities are met. The Synergia Foundation has been effec tive in working with LGUs to purify their communities.\r\nESPLENIA: atomic number 18 we ready for E-Learning? Maybe yes, or maybe no, but if we don’t prepare for it now we volition never be. The technology and the infrastructure have been introduced to the public schools through Gilas, a public-private sector initiatory that has been at the forefront of providing computers and Internet connectivity to public schools nationwide. by dint of Gilas many teachers and students have been trained on the use of technology for education. An eLearning program called Genyo has proven an effective gibe for public school teachers and students. The software is currently being used in private schools and has been donated to public schools through Gilas and the initiative of private foundations.\r\nManuel â€Å"Boy” Mejorada says:\r\nNovember 12, 2010 at 9:57 am\r\nJOEL: I must add that the K-12 revised curriculum isn’t the cure-all termination for our educational woes. Huge investments need to be make on streng thening the education infrastructure †classrooms, textbooks, learning aids, teacher training †at all levels. Adding the ii years volition not repair the defacement if the foundations of a child’s education are weak in the start place. The line of work about the present curriculum in squeezing 12 years of basic education into just 10 is that students are overloaded with subjects. Without even having to go inside a classroom, the common observer can already see this from the oversized bags that students have to lug everyday, make full with books and other learning materials\r\nOne consequence is that the ordinary school day leaves our kids exhausted, with little time for dissolution and societalizing at school. This leads to the exclusion of learning social skills which is an essential part of growing up.\r\nThe main remonstproportionn of parents against the K-12 is more economic than anything else. Parents fear the extra years result result in more expenses to be shouldered. They miss the point about the proposed curriculum pencil lead to improved learning for their children.\r\nDean Jorge Bocobo says:\r\nESPLENIA: I in addition realized that indeed â€Å"TEACHING IS NOT alter UP THE PAIL, IT IS ABOUT LIGHTING THE FIRE.” Blatantly true indeedâ€we should not see out students to be blank sheets, who are incapable of thinking for themselves. My precept career was and is a continuing humbling experience. Our students are geniuses in their own rights, and as educators we should be able to tap on these hidden gifts of theirs. Which brings me to the point of my discussion, pull up stakes this philosophy that teaching is not merely selection up the pail, rather it is lighting up the resurrect be heightened or diminished by what is now called the K to 12 program of the Philippine educational System?\r\nCHAWEE: Another point to consider is that children of this generation, this refre shed generation, more specifically, get easily bored. They have shorter tutelage span and bequeath most likely appearance their boredom and discontent more obviously. So will they be able to bear and cope with the additional years in school? I am also concerned on the preparedness in general with regards to the implementation of this program. Although the program was based on foreign research and was seen to be successful in different countries, but are we certain that this curriculum will be pliant to the Filipino learners, and are the teachers ready to adapt yet again another curriculumâ€believing that this could be the solution to our deteriorating educational system.\r\nJOEL: believing that this could be the solution to our deteriorating educational system. Are the teachers well-informed about the program? Do they have enough training, seminar-workshops and the likes? Have there been researches on the effects of the K-12 program in the Philippine classroom climb?\r\nMan y critics are still bothered that K-12 force be more disastrous than helpful if the innovation is not velvety. As sighted by one of the professors from the University of the Philippines-Diliman, integrating K-12 to the educational system is like overhauling the total system and it obviously require generous time to bring about. Ironically, DepEd keeps reassuring that the time is ample and they will do it gradually. Then if it is true, why was it that most if not all of the kindergarten teachers who underwent the 2-day training for the newly kindergarten curriculum have lots of uncertainties in understanding it? In essence, the teachers are the ones who will transmit the program to the students but if they are less capable and less qualified then it may turn ineffectual and waste of time.\r\nCHAWEE: Amor Cielo says: My take on the K+12, although the purpose or the excogitation of the proponents of this additional school year in the Philippine educational system is perfectly ever yone parents dream for their kids †to roll them the quality of education at par with the globular standards, I feel that it is not ideal in our current educational set-up. I deem that onward we must be able to successfully collide with the global standards that we are aiming for, the government should first require at the current logistics involving the educational system. The following should be first address which has long been a problem ever since.\r\nTwo of my maids from Mindoro experienced the following: * schoolroom shortage †my maid can attest that in Mindoro there are classes held under the tree. * Book paucity †in their school those who are in freeze off section has a ratio of 1:7 usage. * PC usage †only those in the first section has a chance to use the computers. * Teachers’ low salary â€Teaching is regarded as a distinguished profession; they should given proper respect and just compensation / benefits due to them. * Teacher to stud ent ratio †45 to 50 students or more in one classroom. * Lack of basic facilities needed to bid well behaved learning environment †clean teething ring rooms, laboratories, libraries, gymnasium, drinking fountain for potable water, clinic).\r\nJOEL: another valuable thing to consider is that:\r\n* Parents have to shell out more money (for transportation and food) for the education of their children. * The government does not have the money to pay for dickens more years of free education, since it does not even have the money too fully nurse today’s ten years. DepEd must first solve the lack of classrooms, furniture and equipment, qualified teachers, and error-free textbooks. * We can do in ten years what everyone else in the world takes 12 years to do. Why do we have to follow what the rest of the world is doing? Filipinos right now are accepted in esteemed graduate schools in the world, even with only ten years of basic education. * As far as the curriculum i s concerned, DepEd should fix the current subjects instead of adding new ones.\r\nThe problem is the content, not the length, of basic education. As an chromatography column put it, we need to have better education, not more education. * A high school parchment will not get anybody anywhere, because business firms will not hire fresh high school graduates. * era students are stuck in Grades 11 and 12, colleges and universities will have no freshmen for twain years. This will hug drug financial disaster for many private higher(prenominal) Education Institutions (HEIs). * The drop-out rate will increase because of the two extra years. More fundamentally adding two more school years would only exacerbate the situation. * While public education is free, a political youth group estimates that a student would still need an average of P20,000 per school year to cover transportation, food, school supplies and other schooling expenses. * Also, based on the a la mode(p) Family Income and Expenditure Survey, families prioritize spending for food and other basic needs over their children’s school needs. Two more years for basic education would inevitably translate to higher dropout rate. * Former Education secretary Mona Valisno stated in a uninvolved study that DepEd needs at least P100 meg to fully address the shortage of 93,599 classrooms and 134,400 seats and P63 million for textbooks and scholarships\r\nESPLENIA: Objectively, the program is good. But the important thing is what does the public say. Hindrances and opposing minds are there. additional years means additional expenses Thus, an extra effort of explaining is needed as our DepEd secretary brother Luistro Armin explained, allow us not look at it as expenses but rather more of an investment. traditionally poor families have their children worked right after high school.On the brighter side, k-12 envisions that graduates of senior high school are equipped with skills to get better seam opportu nities even if they would not pursue college which means a better income for the family.K-12 is not a perfect program though through years of implementation DepEd were untied for criticisms and suggestions. Since, one of its biggest problems is the resources. Lack of classrooms, teachers, textbooks and other materials yet budget in education increases still it is not enough but, arising the spirit of unity. This is not just Deped program or brother Luistro’s but instead it is a Filipino program for the Filipinos. Positively, if the people see that it is viable, help from LGUs and private sectors will pour in.\r\nJOEL: History speaks itself that we had done for(p) through BRIDGE, BEC, SEC and many changes in our curriculum. want this would be the last; we are unique and adaptable to any kind environment. We Filipinos are survivors. As they say, â€Å"bahala na…” let’s just cross the duad when we get there. Prepared by:\r\nJoel A. Raz\r\nIn conclusion, let me say that the K to 12 program does not only affect DepEd teachers and personnelâ€it affects EVERYBODY. But as we all know, we are â€Å"prisoners” and we cannot question the authorities; we have become victims of the circumstances. However, I realized that regardless of any(prenominal) program is being implemented by the government, or DepEd, or CHED for that matter, what matters is the dedication of the teachers. How are we will to go farther and further and give it all we’ve got, even if there’s nothing left of us to give? It is not a question of how good is the program; it is a question of how are the teachers willing to answer the call of fidelity to the noblest profession.\r\n'